Engaged. Knowledge. Application
A Subject Matter Expert (SME) or domain expert is a person who is an expert in a particular area or topic. When faced with the FDA or another regulatory agency, we tend to call on SMEs that are most intimate or familiar with the details of the process or product in question. In some cases, we reach too deeply into the organization to an individual that has comprehensive knowledge of technical/processes, but not effective at explaining this information. Thus, we open the door to unnecessary…
ContinueAdded by B Christine Park on November 22, 2011 at 10:13pm — No Comments
It is indisputable that life science companies, like all other businesses, are struggling to survive in these very rocky economic times. Uncertainty regarding the future of healthcare costs and global financial stability, unpredictability regarding certain FDA positions (e.g., will 510(k) rules be relaxed or not?, how will FDA regulate supplements?, increased/decreased regulatory burden on brand-name drugs?), difficulty in raising capital and resulting fear of hiring additional…
ContinueAdded by Glenn Melvin on November 11, 2011 at 9:01am — No Comments
During one of my early inspection experiences with the FDA, I found myself working with a team who felt they didn’t need a backroom setup to review documents prior to bringing them to the investigator. Naively, I agreed to let the team move forward with the inspection. As the observer, I watched as things spiraled out of control.
The investigator requested a specific document which was brought into the room. During the review, the investigator asked to speak to the individual…
Added by B Christine Park on November 9, 2011 at 6:00am — No Comments
When was the last time an inspector from the FDA
showed up at your site? While many FDA inspections are scheduled with some
advance notification, there is always a possibility that an inspector from the
Agency could show up at your door any time. Are you prepared?
It is a standard practice to have a Standard
Operating Procedure (SOP) defining what your organization should do when the
FDA (or other government agency) shows up at your site. Some of…
Added by B Christine Park on November 3, 2011 at 9:56am — No Comments
Added by Glenn Melvin on September 29, 2011 at 7:42am — No Comments
My last blog on design verification and validation triggered a lot of comment and response. In fact, some of you started bringing process validation into the discussions. Related to FDA definitions of terms, 21 CFR 820 defines process validation as:
“(z)Validation means confirmation by examination and provision of objective evidence that the particular requirements for a specific intended use can be…
Added by B Christine Park on September 19, 2011 at 9:31pm — No Comments
Added by B Christine Park on August 31, 2011 at 7:00pm — No Comments
The best answer is everyone in the organization. From the CEO through the assembly line operators, this is the one document within your quality management system that everyone should use.
The various ISO standards (ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 13485:2007) require a quality manual as part of the documentation system. FDAs’s Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR 820) requires each manufacturer establish a quality plan defining the quality practices, resources and activities relevant to the…
Added by B Christine Park on August 24, 2011 at 9:29pm — No Comments
I have had many conversations with individuals related to the many software tools currently available on the market these days. Inevitably, the discussion turns to the need to “customize” the tool for specific use, and the need for validation.
Customized software tools require the manufacturer or the customer to modify the source code of the product to meet a specific intended use. The software or product is designed to be specific to the needs of the individual…
ContinueAdded by B Christine Park on August 16, 2011 at 5:56pm — 2 Comments
Added by B Christine Park on August 8, 2011 at 7:05am — No Comments
Document control is still one of the most commons areas of non-conformance in audits and inspections. Analysis of these non-conformances identifies the failure is most often the result of non-compliance to the procedure, rather than noncompliance to the regulation or standard. Let’s look at some of the practices in industry that contribute to these types of issues.
Sometimes, SOPs are written very explicitly in an attempt to error proof them for the employee. As employees become…
Added by B Christine Park on August 3, 2011 at 8:00am — No Comments
A
strong risk management program is one of the cornerstones for an effective quality management system. Does your risk management program extend deep enough into the processes to benefit your organization? Three main areas where risk management can be of great benefit are product safety, process control and
project management.
The ISO 14971:2007 Medical devices – Application of risk management to medical devices document defines requirements to…
Added by B Christine Park on July 25, 2011 at 4:00pm — No Comments
CAPA stands for Corrective Action Preventive Action and is the heart of a strong quality system. It usually is the starting point for most FDA inspections and other quality system audits. There are numerous feeder systems into the CAPA system. A few examples include:
· Complaint management system
· Adverse Event reporting
· Acceptance test failures
· Raw material supply failures/issues
· Nonconforming product
· Field service…
Added by B Christine Park on July 20, 2011 at 11:15am — No Comments
Added by B Christine Park on July 11, 2011 at 11:15am — No Comments
Added by Glenn Melvin on July 6, 2011 at 12:01pm — No Comments
A strong internal audit program can provide executive management with an overall view of the health of the quality system. In my opinion, it is one of the most critical subsystems in the quality system. When effective audits are performed AND meaningful metrics are generated, quality system strengths and gaps become more evident to executive management.
So how do you determine if your internal audit program is effective? It’s more than just generating non- conformances and…
Added by Glenn Melvin on July 6, 2011 at 11:30am — No Comments
The basic concept of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) is based on two key quality principles:
• Processes and procedures are designed and validated to assure products are manufactured to meet specification and perform as expected for the customer.
• Employees are trained on processes, follow procedures and empowered to stop the line whenever there is a problem or failure.
While GMP is a requirement in regulated industries, the basic principles are applicable in…
Added by Glenn Melvin on July 6, 2011 at 11:30am — No Comments
Added by Wendy L Hollett on May 26, 2010 at 4:35pm — No Comments
It is rare to be writing about (literally) the first person you met in industry-almost 20 years ago, and he is STILL serving in the role as a teacher, author and mentor.
Back in the early 90's, I owned the Institute of Validation Technology, and was hosting my first industry conference on "Packaging Validation." I was fortunate enough to meet John Stromp, then working for SmithKline Beecham. I learned that he had a background as a teacher and instructional designer, and I asked him to…
ContinueAdded by Glenn Melvin on March 31, 2010 at 7:00pm — No Comments
Before our GLP Training workshops we conducted recently in California, I had a number of concerns, including meeting our attendees information expectations. Our instructor, Celeste Rose, had developed a number of "real-life" group application team exercises that we were trying for the first time. How would it all work out?
We never expected to have such a fun time in the process...
Attendees Learned and Laughed
Attendees developed a camaraderie among…
ContinueAdded by Glenn Melvin on March 25, 2010 at 4:42pm — No Comments




Phone: +1-561-308-3093
125 South State Road 7, Suite 104-222, Wellington, Fl, 33414, U.S.A.

enKap Terms and Conditions
All sales are final
Legal Disclaimer
This product and any of its enclosures, attachments or appendices, references to online information, conferences or preparations of materials in a variety of formats are created to provide you with accurate and authorative information concerning the subject matter covered. However, this product and any other ancillary items disseminated in connec-
tion with same are not necessarily prepared by a person licensed to practice law in a particular jurisdiction.
enKap, Inc. is not engaged in rendering legal advice, and this product is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. If you require legal or other expert advice, you should seek
the services of a competent attorney or other professional.
enKap, Inc. necessarily is not, cannot and will not be liable for any claims, damages, or regulatory legal proceedings initiated as a consequence of you, the customer, modifying,
altering, adding to or deleting portions of any product initially provided by enKap, Inc.
Once any original document provided by enKap, Inc. to you, whether in print or electronic format, has been manipulated or customized by you, then the responsibility for the
document’s accuracy, correctness, and compliance are solely yours.
If any action, claim for damages, or regulatory proceedings is commenced against enKap, Inc. as a consequence of your alteration or modification, etc. of the document templates
or other originally provided materials, then and in that event, you agree to indemnify enKap, Inc. for such claims, and for any attorney’s fees expended by enKap, Inc. in connec-
tion with defense of same.
© copyright 2010 enKap
© 2012 Created by enKap.